🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension sparked by the announcement of a new comprehensive peace framework for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been contained. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its countermove: an extensive attack of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The succession of conflicting incidents captured the bleak nature of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: positive announcements are delivered from multiple capitals. Significant resources is devoted on managing particular approaches. By night, Russian leadership clearly shows the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As military strikes progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is able to track rocket firings from across the border, a capability afforded by timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, military aircraft that had been scrambled to intercept incoming aerial threats streaked across the sky – advanced fighter aircraft supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons thundered: multiple launches fired to intercept a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably delivered by Western nations. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The instant of fear quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: maybe the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a large-caliber weapon engaged a drone somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – probably allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its target.

With pauses, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: multiple fatalities, devastation and heating outages in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As customarily, everyone still went about their day – enduring hostilities. But those 24 hours demonstrated Ukraine's vital need on external assistance – a dependence that regional partners are evidently unprepared to replace in the immediate future.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from Washington generated strong feelings, debate and deep concern – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from Washington follows the same pattern: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington functions according to a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have been unable to protect through force. The US administration believes that it is unrealistic to pressure the Kremlin to relinquish the land that it already controls in Ukraine's south or east.

The issue is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from believing that the situation will not change more in its advantage in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Russian leadership is certain that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is close to zero. There may be multiple initiatives to stop fighting, but they will continue as long as Russia's leader remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, slowly losing people and territory but preventing a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its favour.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: political desires to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not switch to internal issues. And although their mission will now be significantly challenging after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to terminate the suggested clauses of the latest plan. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by US administration, opposition by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, recent disclosures, all served their function.

While new plans based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect certain reluctance to modify developments, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the coming months, primarily depend on continued Western support.